Lawsuit Over Housing Unit Denial
A Blaine couple, Alex and Lynda Pepin, are currently suing the city of Blaine after officials denied their request to build a backyard housing unit intended for a homeless family. The Pepins argue that the City Council’s decision violated local, state, and federal laws by rejecting their application for a permit to construct a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU).
These types of units, often referred to as mother-in – law suites or granny flats, typically provide additional living space on residential properties. The lawsuit, filed in Anoka County District Court with the support of the nonprofit Institute for Justice, names the city, Mayor Tim Sanders, and several council members as defendants.
City Council’s Justification for Denial
The City Council’s rejection of the Pepins’ request was based on concerns about the potential renting of the unit and whether it would be compatible with the neighborhood. In a statement, city spokesman Ben Hayle affirmed that the council adhered to Minnesota law and Blaine city code during their decision-making process. The council’s decision was made in May, at which point they also instituted a yearlong moratorium on accepting any ADU applications, citing the need to reconsider existing regulations. This decision has prompted questions about the city’s approach to zoning laws and housing accessibility.
Pepins’ Commitment to Helping Others
Alex Pepin, who operates a nonprofit organization dedicated to serving the homeless, expressed his frustration over the city’s decision. He envisioned the ADU as a safe home for a family in need and also intended it as a future living space for his mother-in – law or children after they graduate. In a public statement, Pepin emphasized his family’s commitment to helping those less fortunate, saying, “Our family deeply believes in giving back — in using what we have to help those most in need.” This personal commitment highlights the broader issue of community support and the challenges faced by individuals wanting to contribute positively to society.
Broader Implications for Housing Policy
The case raises significant questions about local housing policies and the balance between community standards and individual rights. Critics argue that denying the Pepins’ request may reflect broader systemic issues regarding affordable housing and homelessness in the region. With the ongoing challenges of housing insecurity, such legal disputes could influence how municipalities approach zoning laws and the approval of housing initiatives. The outcome of this lawsuit may set a precedent for future ADU applications and could impact how cities across Minnesota handle similar requests, especially as they relate to community welfare and housing accessibility.
